<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 253 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68322</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the assessment was barred by limitation. The assessment order dated 31-3-1989 was declared invalid due to being beyond the statutory time limit, as the notice under section 271(1)(c) was served on 10-3-1989, not on 17-3-1988 as claimed by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the AO&#039;s evidence and concluded that the assessment was time-barred, making any decision on the merits of the case irrelevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 253 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68322</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, holding that the assessment was barred by limitation. The assessment order dated 31-3-1989 was declared invalid due to being beyond the statutory time limit, as the notice under section 271(1)(c) was served on 10-3-1989, not on 17-3-1988 as claimed by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the AO&#039;s evidence and concluded that the assessment was time-barred, making any decision on the merits of the case irrelevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>