<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 371 - ITAT JAIPUR-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68304</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to grant the deduction under section 80JJA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, recognizing the subsidy as part of the sales price and a trading receipt. Additionally, the Tribunal found the 20% disallowance of expenses for alleged personal use excessive and instructed the AO to limit the disallowance to 10%. The decision was announced on March 31, 2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 371 - ITAT JAIPUR-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68304</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal. It directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to grant the deduction under section 80JJA of the Income-tax Act, 1961, recognizing the subsidy as part of the sales price and a trading receipt. Additionally, the Tribunal found the 20% disallowance of expenses for alleged personal use excessive and instructed the AO to limit the disallowance to 10%. The decision was announced on March 31, 2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68304</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>