<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 268 - ITAT JAIPUR-B</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68299</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that no TDS was required under section 194 for payments to non-shareholders, thus the assessee was not in default under section 201. Consequently, the Tribunal also overturned the levy of interest under section 201(1A), ultimately resulting in the appeal being successful for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 268 - ITAT JAIPUR-B</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68299</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, ruling that no TDS was required under section 194 for payments to non-shareholders, thus the assessee was not in default under section 201. Consequently, the Tribunal also overturned the levy of interest under section 201(1A), ultimately resulting in the appeal being successful for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>