<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (11) TMI 255 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68230</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the claim under section 32A for Rs. 35,96,015, following established judicial precedents. The entertainment expenditure claim was partly allowed, limiting the deduction to 20%. The issue concerning the disallowance of liabilities for the superannuation fund and gratuity was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106632" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (11) TMI 255 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68230</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee on the claim under section 32A for Rs. 35,96,015, following established judicial precedents. The entertainment expenditure claim was partly allowed, limiting the deduction to 20%. The issue concerning the disallowance of liabilities for the superannuation fund and gratuity was remanded to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>