<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 258 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68226</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the decision to allow relief under s. 89(1) alongside the exemption under s. 10(10C) for the ex gratia payment, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The tribunal emphasized that relief under s. 89(1) serves to alleviate tax burden, distinct from the exemption under s. 10(10C), and highlighted the broad definition of &#039;salary&#039; under s. 17 and the applicability of s. 89 to grant both benefits claimed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 18:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 258 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68226</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the decision to allow relief under s. 89(1) alongside the exemption under s. 10(10C) for the ex gratia payment, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The tribunal emphasized that relief under s. 89(1) serves to alleviate tax burden, distinct from the exemption under s. 10(10C), and highlighted the broad definition of &#039;salary&#039; under s. 17 and the applicability of s. 89 to grant both benefits claimed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>