<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 235 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68223</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that export through a supporting manufacturer does not qualify as direct export and cannot be included in the export turnover for Section 80HHC deduction. The original deduction claims were upheld for different assessment years, rejecting the higher deductions claimed in revised returns. The Tribunal consistently upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decisions, denying the increased deductions sought by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 18:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 235 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68223</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that export through a supporting manufacturer does not qualify as direct export and cannot be included in the export turnover for Section 80HHC deduction. The original deduction claims were upheld for different assessment years, rejecting the higher deductions claimed in revised returns. The Tribunal consistently upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s decisions, denying the increased deductions sought by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>