<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 283 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68220</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271D for the violation of section 269SS, emphasizing the technical nature of the breach and the absence of any substantial violation. The Tribunal declined to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s order, ultimately dismissing the appeal of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 13:44:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 283 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68220</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to cancel the penalty under section 271D for the violation of section 269SS, emphasizing the technical nature of the breach and the absence of any substantial violation. The Tribunal declined to interfere with the CIT(A)&#039;s order, ultimately dismissing the appeal of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>