<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 167 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that statements recorded under Section 132(4) of the IT Act were invalid as they were not voluntary. The affidavits and statements submitted by the assessee were deemed credible evidence, supporting the claim that the jewellery belonged to family members. The Tribunal accepted that the possession of jewellery was reasonable and explained, in line with family customs. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:05:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 167 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that statements recorded under Section 132(4) of the IT Act were invalid as they were not voluntary. The affidavits and statements submitted by the assessee were deemed credible evidence, supporting the claim that the jewellery belonged to family members. The Tribunal accepted that the possession of jewellery was reasonable and explained, in line with family customs. Consequently, the appeal by the assessee was allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>