<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 89 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68187</link>
    <description>The court upheld the additions of Rs. 9,05,184 and Rs. 1,500 due to overvaluation of closing stock and telephone expenses, respectively. However, the addition of Rs. 58,700 on account of interest was deleted. The disallowance of loss on the sale of a car was upheld, considering it as a capital loss. The levy of interest under Sections 139(8) and 217 was also deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:57:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 89 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68187</link>
      <description>The court upheld the additions of Rs. 9,05,184 and Rs. 1,500 due to overvaluation of closing stock and telephone expenses, respectively. However, the addition of Rs. 58,700 on account of interest was deleted. The disallowance of loss on the sale of a car was upheld, considering it as a capital loss. The levy of interest under Sections 139(8) and 217 was also deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68187</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>