<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (1) TMI 137 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68178</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of penalties imposed under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for the assessment years 1982-83 to 1984-85. The Tribunal emphasized that the Revenue failed to prove the mens rea of a quasi-criminal offense for penalty imposition solely based on the assessee&#039;s surrender of income, noting the absence of incriminating material and fear of detection. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, overturning the penalties initially imposed by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:41:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (1) TMI 137 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68178</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of penalties imposed under s. 271(1)(c) of the IT Act for the assessment years 1982-83 to 1984-85. The Tribunal emphasized that the Revenue failed to prove the mens rea of a quasi-criminal offense for penalty imposition solely based on the assessee&#039;s surrender of income, noting the absence of incriminating material and fear of detection. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, overturning the penalties initially imposed by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>