<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (3) TMI 180 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68174</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, accepting the appellant&#039;s results for the transportation contract and adjusting the net profit rate for the PHED contract. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering operational nuances and commercial practices in assessing income under section 145.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:32:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (3) TMI 180 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68174</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, accepting the appellant&#039;s results for the transportation contract and adjusting the net profit rate for the PHED contract. The judgment emphasized the importance of considering operational nuances and commercial practices in assessing income under section 145.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>