<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 132 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68171</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty for concealed income of Rs. 60,823 but canceled penalties related to other additions due to insufficient evidence. The CIT(A) reduced the penalty quantum to the minimum amount imposable of Rs. 1,31,925. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:25:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106573" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 132 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68171</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the penalty for concealed income of Rs. 60,823 but canceled penalties related to other additions due to insufficient evidence. The CIT(A) reduced the penalty quantum to the minimum amount imposable of Rs. 1,31,925. The appeal by the assessee was partly allowed, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>