<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68162</link>
    <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving multiple issues such as disallowance of T.V. installation cost, consultancy fees for lease renewal, and electricity charges by RSEB. The ITAT allowed legitimate business expenses, rejected capital nature treatment for certain expenditures, and directed deductions in line with legal precedents. The ITAT&#039;s decisions favored the assessee by addressing disallowances and computations based on legal interpretations, ultimately partially allowing all three appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106564" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 129 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68162</link>
      <description>The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee in a case involving multiple issues such as disallowance of T.V. installation cost, consultancy fees for lease renewal, and electricity charges by RSEB. The ITAT allowed legitimate business expenses, rejected capital nature treatment for certain expenditures, and directed deductions in line with legal precedents. The ITAT&#039;s decisions favored the assessee by addressing disallowances and computations based on legal interpretations, ultimately partially allowing all three appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>