<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (7) TMI 127 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68156</link>
    <description>The penalties imposed under sections 271D and 271E were canceled by the Tribunal due to being outside the prescribed limitation period. The Tribunal allowed both appeals by the assessee solely on this ground, without considering other arguments presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:19:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (7) TMI 127 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68156</link>
      <description>The penalties imposed under sections 271D and 271E were canceled by the Tribunal due to being outside the prescribed limitation period. The Tribunal allowed both appeals by the assessee solely on this ground, without considering other arguments presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>