<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (7) TMI 128 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68146</link>
    <description>The ITAT Jaipur ruled in favor of the firm, upholding its adherence to the cash system of accounting. The tribunal emphasized the firm&#039;s right to choose its accounting method and found no evidence of unaccounted cash receipts. The ITAT overturned the additions made by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A), highlighting the importance of accurately interpreting cash-based accounting practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 12:52:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (7) TMI 128 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68146</link>
      <description>The ITAT Jaipur ruled in favor of the firm, upholding its adherence to the cash system of accounting. The tribunal emphasized the firm&#039;s right to choose its accounting method and found no evidence of unaccounted cash receipts. The ITAT overturned the additions made by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A), highlighting the importance of accurately interpreting cash-based accounting practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>