https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68140 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, upholding the ground pertaining to non-adherence to the principles of natural justice and remitting the matter to the file of the learned Commissioner of Wealth Tax for a fresh decision after providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The Tribunal did not express an opinion on the merits of the case regarding the denial of exemption to heirloom jewelry and Samora Bagh Palace under Sections 5(1)(xiv) and 5(1)(iii) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:53:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68140 The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, upholding the ground pertaining to non-adherence to the principles of natural justice and remitting the matter to the file of the learned Commissioner of Wealth Tax for a fresh decision after providing an opportunity of being heard to the assessee. The Tribunal did not express an opinion on the merits of the case regarding the denial of exemption to heirloom jewelry and Samora Bagh Palace under Sections 5(1)(xiv) and 5(1)(iii) of the Wealth Tax Act, 1957. Case-Laws Wealth-tax Mon, 07 Nov 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68140