<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (10) TMI 134 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68134</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 1 lac addition for investment in the construction of a residential house, as evidence showed the wife owned the property and made the investment. However, the addition to business income was upheld due to the lack of maintained accounts and proper income estimation, leading to a sustained decision by the IT authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:32:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106541" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (10) TMI 134 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68134</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, deleting the Rs. 1 lac addition for investment in the construction of a residential house, as evidence showed the wife owned the property and made the investment. However, the addition to business income was upheld due to the lack of maintained accounts and proper income estimation, leading to a sustained decision by the IT authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>