<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 250 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68119</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the disallowances made by the lower authorities regarding depreciation claims on computer hardware and software, late payment to the Provident Fund, and advertisement expenses. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of the purchases, lacked evidence for the late payment claim, and did not provide supporting documents for the advertisement expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 250 - ITAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68119</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeals filed by the assessee, upholding the disallowances made by the lower authorities regarding depreciation claims on computer hardware and software, late payment to the Provident Fund, and advertisement expenses. The Tribunal found that the assessee failed to substantiate the genuineness of the purchases, lacked evidence for the late payment claim, and did not provide supporting documents for the advertisement expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>