<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 149 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68094</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellants were not entitled to the concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 315/83-Cus. The decision was based on the classification of the industry and the nature of the imported goods, emphasizing the need for proper adherence to regulatory frameworks in determining duty rates for imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106526" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 149 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68094</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the appellants were not entitled to the concessional rate of duty under Notification No. 315/83-Cus. The decision was based on the classification of the industry and the nature of the imported goods, emphasizing the need for proper adherence to regulatory frameworks in determining duty rates for imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>