<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 238 - Bombay High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68091</link>
    <description>HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in limine, holding the Board&#039;s policy-per CBDT instructions-not to pursue appeals where the monetary effect falls below prescribed thresholds is binding on the Revenue. The court declined to examine the substantive legal question raised because the policy decision justified disposal on that short ground. Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2025 09:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106525" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 238 - Bombay High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68091</link>
      <description>HC dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal in limine, holding the Board&#039;s policy-per CBDT instructions-not to pursue appeals where the monetary effect falls below prescribed thresholds is binding on the Revenue. The court declined to examine the substantive legal question raised because the policy decision justified disposal on that short ground. Appeal dismissed with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>