<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 174 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68088</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Department failed to prove that the income in question was concealed by the assessee. It was determined that the assessee did not conceal or provide inaccurate particulars of income, thus not warranting a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was revoked, and the appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:21:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106523" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 174 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68088</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Department failed to prove that the income in question was concealed by the assessee. It was determined that the assessee did not conceal or provide inaccurate particulars of income, thus not warranting a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the IT Act. Consequently, the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer was revoked, and the appeal by the assessee was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68088</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>