https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68084 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the AAC to cancel the Income Tax Officer's order under section 186(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that despite defects pointed out by the ITO, the firm was genuine, and registration should not have been cancelled based on the same grounds that existed since the beginning of registration. Both the Revenue's appeals and the assessee's cross-objections were dismissed by the Tribunal, affirming the cancellation of the ITO's order. en-us Wed, 20 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:10:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68084 The Appellate Tribunal upheld the decision of the AAC to cancel the Income Tax Officer's order under section 186(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that despite defects pointed out by the ITO, the firm was genuine, and registration should not have been cancelled based on the same grounds that existed since the beginning of registration. Both the Revenue's appeals and the assessee's cross-objections were dismissed by the Tribunal, affirming the cancellation of the ITO's order. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 20 Sep 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68084