<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (1) TMI 132 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68081</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions for unexplained investments in silver and certain gold ornaments. The issue of gold bangles was remanded for fresh examination. Additions for low withdrawals and discrepancies in purchase bills were confirmed, while objections regarding interest charges and the re-opening of assessment were rejected. The Tribunal clarified the right of cross-examination for future proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 18:01:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (1) TMI 132 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68081</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of additions for unexplained investments in silver and certain gold ornaments. The issue of gold bangles was remanded for fresh examination. Additions for low withdrawals and discrepancies in purchase bills were confirmed, while objections regarding interest charges and the re-opening of assessment were rejected. The Tribunal clarified the right of cross-examination for future proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>