https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68065 The tribunal allowed the appeal in part by deleting the addition of Rs. 19,755 to trading results as the assessing officer's comparable case was found unjustified. The disallowance of Rs. 1200 from shop expenses was deleted due to lack of basis provided. The disallowance of Rs. 600 from travelling expenses was upheld as the required break-up of expenses was not submitted. The rejection of the claim under s. 80G for donation to Gaushala was directed to be allowed upon submission of appropriate evidence. The charge of interest under s. 215 was deemed consequential, and the assessing officer was directed to pass appropriate orders. en-us Fri, 25 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:10:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68065 The tribunal allowed the appeal in part by deleting the addition of Rs. 19,755 to trading results as the assessing officer's comparable case was found unjustified. The disallowance of Rs. 1200 from shop expenses was deleted due to lack of basis provided. The disallowance of Rs. 600 from travelling expenses was upheld as the required break-up of expenses was not submitted. The rejection of the claim under s. 80G for donation to Gaushala was directed to be allowed upon submission of appropriate evidence. The charge of interest under s. 215 was deemed consequential, and the assessing officer was directed to pass appropriate orders. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 25 Nov 1988 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68065