<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 177 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68038</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, canceling the protective assessments made by the ITO. The Tribunal found the additions made were unjustified, and the remission of the matter by the Dy. Commissioner(A) lacked legal authority. The Tribunal held that the protective assessments were not justified in law as the assessees had provided evidence of their income sources. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the protective assessments were overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106473" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 177 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68038</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessees, canceling the protective assessments made by the ITO. The Tribunal found the additions made were unjustified, and the remission of the matter by the Dy. Commissioner(A) lacked legal authority. The Tribunal held that the protective assessments were not justified in law as the assessees had provided evidence of their income sources. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, and the protective assessments were overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>