<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (1) TMI 173 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68026</link>
    <description>Delay in filing a return did not attract penalty under section 271(1)(a) where the assessee&#039;s prepaid taxes exceeded the assessed tax. Applying the jurisdictional High Court ruling, the Tribunal treated the assessed tax as nil in such circumstances and held that penalty for late filing could not be imposed under section 271(1)(a)(i)(b). The Department&#039;s challenge therefore failed and the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:35:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (1) TMI 173 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68026</link>
      <description>Delay in filing a return did not attract penalty under section 271(1)(a) where the assessee&#039;s prepaid taxes exceeded the assessed tax. Applying the jurisdictional High Court ruling, the Tribunal treated the assessed tax as nil in such circumstances and held that penalty for late filing could not be imposed under section 271(1)(a)(i)(b). The Department&#039;s challenge therefore failed and the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>