<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 210 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68016</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in all aspects of the case. The initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 147(A) for the assessment year 1981-82 was deemed invalid as all necessary facts were disclosed during the original assessment. The additions of undisclosed investments and expenditures for various assessment years were found to lack sufficient basis or evidence and were directed to be deleted. The Tribunal also upheld the assessee&#039;s position regarding the undisclosed income from a land dealing business and the assessment of income from another source for different assessment years. Ultimately, all appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the additions made by the Assessing Officer were ordered to be removed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 14:00:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 210 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68016</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in all aspects of the case. The initiation of reassessment proceedings under section 147(A) for the assessment year 1981-82 was deemed invalid as all necessary facts were disclosed during the original assessment. The additions of undisclosed investments and expenditures for various assessment years were found to lack sufficient basis or evidence and were directed to be deleted. The Tribunal also upheld the assessee&#039;s position regarding the undisclosed income from a land dealing business and the assessment of income from another source for different assessment years. Ultimately, all appeals by the assessee were allowed, and the additions made by the Assessing Officer were ordered to be removed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=68016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>