<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 464 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67998</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed regarding the disallowance of remuneration paid to working partners and the disallowance of brokerage. The disallowance of the interest differential amount was upheld. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowed remuneration claim, emphasizing that no double taxation should occur.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:36:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 464 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67998</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed regarding the disallowance of remuneration paid to working partners and the disallowance of brokerage. The disallowance of the interest differential amount was upheld. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowed remuneration claim, emphasizing that no double taxation should occur.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>