<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (7) TMI 116 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67995</link>
    <description>An unsigned draft assessment proposal forwarded by the ITO to the IAC under Section 144B did not amount to an appealable order. A forwarding letter signed by the ITO could not convert the draft into a formal order, because the statutory procedure had not yet culminated in a completed assessment order. On that basis, the appeal before the CIT(A) against the draft proposal was not maintainable, and the CIT(A) was not justified in entertaining it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:27:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (7) TMI 116 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67995</link>
      <description>An unsigned draft assessment proposal forwarded by the ITO to the IAC under Section 144B did not amount to an appealable order. A forwarding letter signed by the ITO could not convert the draft into a formal order, because the statutory procedure had not yet culminated in a completed assessment order. On that basis, the appeal before the CIT(A) against the draft proposal was not maintainable, and the CIT(A) was not justified in entertaining it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>