<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1987 (9) TMI 97 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the reference applications, concluding that Rule 2B(2) was not applicable as the Department failed to prove market value exceeding book value by more than 20 percent. The issue of onus was not considered as it was not raised in the appeal. The firm qualified as an industrial undertaking under Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the WT Act, exempting the assessee&#039;s interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1987 (9) TMI 97 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the reference applications, concluding that Rule 2B(2) was not applicable as the Department failed to prove market value exceeding book value by more than 20 percent. The issue of onus was not considered as it was not raised in the appeal. The firm qualified as an industrial undertaking under Section 5(1)(xxxii) of the WT Act, exempting the assessee&#039;s interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 1987 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>