<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67953</link>
    <description>Section 80-I deduction was required to be computed at 20% of the profits and gains of the undertaking itself, not on residual income left after allowing section 80-HH relief. Section 80HH(9) only determines the order in which multiple Chapter VI-A deductions are applied, while section 80A(2) limits only the aggregate deduction to the gross total income. The computation base therefore remains the commercial profits of the undertaking, subject to the statutory ceiling, rather than a reduced figure after prior deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (11) TMI 137 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67953</link>
      <description>Section 80-I deduction was required to be computed at 20% of the profits and gains of the undertaking itself, not on residual income left after allowing section 80-HH relief. Section 80HH(9) only determines the order in which multiple Chapter VI-A deductions are applied, while section 80A(2) limits only the aggregate deduction to the gross total income. The computation base therefore remains the commercial profits of the undertaking, subject to the statutory ceiling, rather than a reduced figure after prior deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>