<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 184 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67942</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the exclusion of partitioned jewelry from the wealth of the assessee HUF, emphasizing the legal consequences of partial partition and rejecting the notion of creating smaller HUFs within the larger HUF based on individual separations. The judgment provides clarity on the treatment of partially partitioned assets in the context of HUF taxation, aligning with established legal principles and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:46:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 184 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67942</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the exclusion of partitioned jewelry from the wealth of the assessee HUF, emphasizing the legal consequences of partial partition and rejecting the notion of creating smaller HUFs within the larger HUF based on individual separations. The judgment provides clarity on the treatment of partially partitioned assets in the context of HUF taxation, aligning with established legal principles and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>