<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (8) TMI 147 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the correctness of the ITO&#039;s order under Section 155 of the IT Act, deeming the orders to be passed under Section 154 instead. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate disclosure by the assessee and denied any benefits resulting from the assessee&#039;s failure to provide correct information during the assessment process. The appeals were dismissed, holding the assessee responsible for the lapse in disclosing accurate information and ruling out any leniency for the assessee&#039;s default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:31:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (8) TMI 147 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the correctness of the ITO&#039;s order under Section 155 of the IT Act, deeming the orders to be passed under Section 154 instead. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accurate disclosure by the assessee and denied any benefits resulting from the assessee&#039;s failure to provide correct information during the assessment process. The appeals were dismissed, holding the assessee responsible for the lapse in disclosing accurate information and ruling out any leniency for the assessee&#039;s default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>