<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 111 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67918</link>
    <description>A cinema building specially designed for film exhibition was treated as plant because it functioned as the basic apparatus of the business, not as a mere premises where activity occurred. The building was considered integral to housing the audience and enabling screening and exhibition of films, making it distinct from an ordinary commercial building. On that basis, depreciation was allowed at the rate applicable to plant in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:08:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 111 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67918</link>
      <description>A cinema building specially designed for film exhibition was treated as plant because it functioned as the basic apparatus of the business, not as a mere premises where activity occurred. The building was considered integral to housing the audience and enabling screening and exhibition of films, making it distinct from an ordinary commercial building. On that basis, depreciation was allowed at the rate applicable to plant in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67918</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>