<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (4) TMI 137 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67912</link>
    <description>A bona fide explanation supported by affidavit and surrounding circumstances can constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay, and the 64-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned. Penalty for late filing of a wealth-tax return was held unjustified where the assessee claimed exemption under section 5(1)(iv) and, on that basis, the net wealth was stated to fall below the taxable limit; the default was treated as technical and the levy as harsh and disproportionate. The appeal was entertained and the penalty was cancelled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:55:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106347" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (4) TMI 137 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67912</link>
      <description>A bona fide explanation supported by affidavit and surrounding circumstances can constitute sufficient cause for condonation of delay, and the 64-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned. Penalty for late filing of a wealth-tax return was held unjustified where the assessee claimed exemption under section 5(1)(iv) and, on that basis, the net wealth was stated to fall below the taxable limit; the default was treated as technical and the levy as harsh and disproportionate. The appeal was entertained and the penalty was cancelled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67912</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>