<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (4) TMI 126 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67909</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the properties, business income, and compensation should be assessed as HUF property, rejecting the Department&#039;s view of impartibility. The Tribunal directed the ITO to consider the partition claim and assess the income accordingly. The appeals by the assessee were partly allowed, and those by the Department were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:46:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106344" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (4) TMI 126 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67909</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the properties, business income, and compensation should be assessed as HUF property, rejecting the Department&#039;s view of impartibility. The Tribunal directed the ITO to consider the partition claim and assess the income accordingly. The appeals by the assessee were partly allowed, and those by the Department were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>