<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 128 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67906</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the validity of re-opening proceedings under section 17 of the Wealth Tax Act, ruling in favor of the tax authority. It found that the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose all firm assets for wealth tax computation constituted a non-disclosure of material facts, justifying the reopening of assessments. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of full disclosure of all material facts, including firm assets, for accurate wealth tax liability calculation. Additionally, it clarified that recorded reasons for reopening assessments were not mandatory under the WT Act and that fresh proceedings could be initiated even during pending assessments, provided valid grounds existed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:33:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 128 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67906</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the validity of re-opening proceedings under section 17 of the Wealth Tax Act, ruling in favor of the tax authority. It found that the assessee&#039;s failure to disclose all firm assets for wealth tax computation constituted a non-disclosure of material facts, justifying the reopening of assessments. The tribunal emphasized the necessity of full disclosure of all material facts, including firm assets, for accurate wealth tax liability calculation. Additionally, it clarified that recorded reasons for reopening assessments were not mandatory under the WT Act and that fresh proceedings could be initiated even during pending assessments, provided valid grounds existed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>