<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (12) TMI 127 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67904</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal accepted the appeal and canceled the penalty imposed on the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and proof in justifying penalties for income concealment, highlighting that mere inaccuracies may not suffice for penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2011 12:28:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (12) TMI 127 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67904</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal accepted the appeal and canceled the penalty imposed on the assessee. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of concrete evidence and proof in justifying penalties for income concealment, highlighting that mere inaccuracies may not suffice for penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>