https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67863 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Accountable Person, holding that the deceased had legally impressed his property with the character of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) under Dayabhaga Law. Consequently, the house property in question was classified as belonging to the HUF and not to the deceased individually. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the property became the HUF's asset from the date of declaration, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on the ownership of the house property. en-us Mon, 14 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Mar 2011 11:04:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67863 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Accountable Person, holding that the deceased had legally impressed his property with the character of Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) under Dayabhaga Law. Consequently, the house property in question was classified as belonging to the HUF and not to the deceased individually. The Tribunal upheld the decision that the property became the HUF's asset from the date of declaration, dismissing the Revenue's appeal on the ownership of the house property. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 14 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67863