<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (1) TMI 102 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67809</link>
    <description>Section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act was treated as a procedural valuation provision and, on that basis, applied to assessments pending when it came into force; the valuation accepted for an earlier year in respect of the self-occupied property was carried forward for the year under discussion. For the commercial let-out property, the capitalisation multiple for net maintainable rent was reduced from 12 to 10 because no reason was given for the higher figure and the property&#039;s commercial, let-out character supported the lower multiple. The overall result was that the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessee obtained relief on the valuation method applied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:30:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (1) TMI 102 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67809</link>
      <description>Section 7(4) of the Wealth-tax Act was treated as a procedural valuation provision and, on that basis, applied to assessments pending when it came into force; the valuation accepted for an earlier year in respect of the self-occupied property was carried forward for the year under discussion. For the commercial let-out property, the capitalisation multiple for net maintainable rent was reduced from 12 to 10 because no reason was given for the higher figure and the property&#039;s commercial, let-out character supported the lower multiple. The overall result was that the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the assessee obtained relief on the valuation method applied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>