<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 194 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67804</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of valid service of notices and the necessity for explicit authorization for receiving notices on behalf of a party. The Tribunal&#039;s decision highlights the significance of procedural compliance and the requirement for proper authorization in matters related to the condonation of delay and service of legal notices in tax penalty cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:51:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 194 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67804</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of valid service of notices and the necessity for explicit authorization for receiving notices on behalf of a party. The Tribunal&#039;s decision highlights the significance of procedural compliance and the requirement for proper authorization in matters related to the condonation of delay and service of legal notices in tax penalty cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>