<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (3) TMI 77 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67712</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty order imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding no concrete evidence to support the claim of bogus purchases. The assessee successfully demonstrated the purchases&#039; genuineness with supporting evidence, leading to the conclusion that there was no wilful neglect in disclosing income. The Tribunal held that the penalty was unjustified, overturning the AAC&#039;s decision and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 11:33:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (3) TMI 77 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67712</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty order imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, finding no concrete evidence to support the claim of bogus purchases. The assessee successfully demonstrated the purchases&#039; genuineness with supporting evidence, leading to the conclusion that there was no wilful neglect in disclosing income. The Tribunal held that the penalty was unjustified, overturning the AAC&#039;s decision and allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>