<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (4) TMI 64 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67683</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed both appeals, canceling the penalties imposed under sections 271(1)(a) and 273 of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1974-75. The ITAT found reasonable causes for the delay in filing the return and determined that the penalty for not furnishing an estimate of advance tax payable was unjustified due to procedural errors and lack of evidence of intentional wrongdoing by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:27:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106118" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (4) TMI 64 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67683</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed both appeals, canceling the penalties imposed under sections 271(1)(a) and 273 of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1974-75. The ITAT found reasonable causes for the delay in filing the return and determined that the penalty for not furnishing an estimate of advance tax payable was unjustified due to procedural errors and lack of evidence of intentional wrongdoing by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>