<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (8) TMI 83 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67681</link>
    <description>The tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 680 imposed under section 273(a) of the IT Act for the alleged default in filing an estimate under section 212(3A) for the assessment year 1975-76. The tribunal found that the penalty order was defective as it was based on a charge different from the show cause notice, and there was no evidence to suggest that the assessee deliberately filed an untrue estimate. Additionally, the tribunal noted that even if the penalty was applicable, the tax paid exceeded the required amount, making the penalty unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:23:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106116" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (8) TMI 83 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67681</link>
      <description>The tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 680 imposed under section 273(a) of the IT Act for the alleged default in filing an estimate under section 212(3A) for the assessment year 1975-76. The tribunal found that the penalty order was defective as it was based on a charge different from the show cause notice, and there was no evidence to suggest that the assessee deliberately filed an untrue estimate. Additionally, the tribunal noted that even if the penalty was applicable, the tax paid exceeded the required amount, making the penalty unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>