<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (5) TMI 39 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67659</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was leviable as the burden of proof for concealment of income was not met by the Department. The Tribunal found the mistake in totalling to be a bona fide error and not intentional, thus canceling the penalty order imposed on the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:06:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (5) TMI 39 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67659</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that no penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was leviable as the burden of proof for concealment of income was not met by the Department. The Tribunal found the mistake in totalling to be a bona fide error and not intentional, thus canceling the penalty order imposed on the assessee. The appeal was allowed, and the penalty was revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>