<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1976 (5) TMI 38 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67654</link>
    <description>The appeals of the assessee were allowed. The judgment emphasized that the Companies Act, 1956, and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, take precedence over the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the context of a company in liquidation. The charging of interest under Section 220(2) by the Income Tax Officer was deemed a mistake apparent from the record, leading to the conclusion that the interest charged should be rectified under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:38:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1976 (5) TMI 38 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67654</link>
      <description>The appeals of the assessee were allowed. The judgment emphasized that the Companies Act, 1956, and the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, take precedence over the Income Tax Act, 1961, in the context of a company in liquidation. The charging of interest under Section 220(2) by the Income Tax Officer was deemed a mistake apparent from the record, leading to the conclusion that the interest charged should be rectified under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 May 1976 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>