<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 199 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67643</link>
    <description>Section 254(2) permits rectification only of a mistake apparent from the record, not a review or detailed reappraisal of evidence. The Tribunal treated mistaken assumptions already reflected in the record as rectifiable, including overlooked or misunderstood material on jewellery disclosed in the wealth-tax return, jewellery found on Shri Anand, jewellery received under the will of late Smt. Rajshree Jethwani, and surrender reflected in the firm&#039;s case, and it allowed the corresponding credits while deleting related additions. It declined rectification on the factual observation that the search and surrender occurred simultaneously, finding no error in that statement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 11:08:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 199 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67643</link>
      <description>Section 254(2) permits rectification only of a mistake apparent from the record, not a review or detailed reappraisal of evidence. The Tribunal treated mistaken assumptions already reflected in the record as rectifiable, including overlooked or misunderstood material on jewellery disclosed in the wealth-tax return, jewellery found on Shri Anand, jewellery received under the will of late Smt. Rajshree Jethwani, and surrender reflected in the firm&#039;s case, and it allowed the corresponding credits while deleting related additions. It declined rectification on the factual observation that the search and surrender occurred simultaneously, finding no error in that statement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>