<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 66 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67634</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the matter back to the AO for correct profit determination. It emphasized the need for accurate income assessment based on seized material, highlighting discrepancies in stock and sales calculations. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing the assessee with an opportunity for further explanation, ensuring a fair assessment process and avoiding repetitive additions in subsequent years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:47:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 66 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67634</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the matter back to the AO for correct profit determination. It emphasized the need for accurate income assessment based on seized material, highlighting discrepancies in stock and sales calculations. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing the assessee with an opportunity for further explanation, ensuring a fair assessment process and avoiding repetitive additions in subsequent years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67634</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>