<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 124 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67633</link>
    <description>Deferred sales tax under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Deferment Scheme may satisfy section 43B where the State&#039;s amended framework treats the deferred liability as actually paid, and the CBDT circular supports that treatment. The discussion also states that deduction under section 80-I is to be computed on the undertaking&#039;s profits without first reducing the deduction under section 80HH, because the provisions operate on the relevant profits and the statutory order of consideration does not require a balance-first approach. On interest disallowance, the material was found insufficient to establish the nexus between borrowed funds and interest-free advances, so the matter required fresh factual verification before any final conclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:46:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106068" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 124 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67633</link>
      <description>Deferred sales tax under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Deferment Scheme may satisfy section 43B where the State&#039;s amended framework treats the deferred liability as actually paid, and the CBDT circular supports that treatment. The discussion also states that deduction under section 80-I is to be computed on the undertaking&#039;s profits without first reducing the deduction under section 80HH, because the provisions operate on the relevant profits and the statutory order of consideration does not require a balance-first approach. On interest disallowance, the material was found insufficient to establish the nexus between borrowed funds and interest-free advances, so the matter required fresh factual verification before any final conclusion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67633</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>