<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (2) TMI 106 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67630</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with penalties upheld for one transaction while penalties for the other two transactions were set aside due to reasonable cause. The AO was directed to recompute the penalty only for the third amount of Rs. 40,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:41:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=106065" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (2) TMI 106 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67630</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with penalties upheld for one transaction while penalties for the other two transactions were set aside due to reasonable cause. The AO was directed to recompute the penalty only for the third amount of Rs. 40,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=67630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>